At the COP29 conference in Baku, nearly 200 nations endorsed a contentious climate agreement involving a commitment of $300 billion annually from wealthier nations to support global climate finance. However, the agreement has been met with sharp criticism from developing countries, which view the pledged sum as insufficient to address the escalating climate crisis and its disproportionate impact on vulnerable nations.
India, represented by delegate Chandni Raina, strongly opposed the agreement, calling the financial commitment "abysmally poor" and "a paltry sum." She emphasized that the funding falls far short of meeting the needs and priorities of developing countries and fails to align with the principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibilities (CBDR), a core tenet of global climate negotiations. Nigeria, Malawi, and Bolivia echoed India's sentiments, with Nigeria dismissing the $300 billion package as a "joke."
In contrast, the agreement was welcomed by representatives of developed nations. EU climate envoy Wopke Hoekstra described the deal as the beginning of a "new era for climate finance," while US President Joe Biden praised it as a "significant step" in combating global warming. Biden reaffirmed America's commitment to climate action despite concerns over the stance of his successor, Donald Trump, who is known for his climate skepticism.
The stark division between developed and developing nations underscores the ongoing tensions in global climate negotiations, particularly regarding the equitable distribution of responsibilities and resources. As the world grapples with the intensifying impacts of climate change, the adequacy and implementation of such agreements remain critical points of debate.
We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Read more...